APFID

Home > Latest News on ID > Interesting Papers

LOGIN
S. aureus nasal colonization and subsequent infection in ICU patients: does methicillin resistance matter?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:584
Date: 2010-06-15   Read: 158026

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Jun;31(6):584-91

Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization and subsequent infection in intensive care unit patients: does methicillin resistance matter?

Honda H, Krauss MJ, Coopersmith CM, Kollef MH, Richmond AM, Fraser VJ, Warren DK

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is an important cause of infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Colonization with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is a risk factor for subsequent S. aureus infection. However, MRSA-colonized patients may have more comorbidities than methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)-colonized or noncolonized patients and therefore may be more susceptible to infection on that basis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether MRSA-colonized patients who are admitted to medical and surgical ICUs are more likely to develop any S. aureus infection in the ICU, compared with patients colonized with MSSA or not colonized with S. aureus, independent of predisposing patient risk factors.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: A 24-bed surgical ICU and a 19-bed medical ICU of a 1,252-bed, academic hospital.
PATIENTS: A total of 9,523 patients for whom nasal swab samples were cultured for S. aureus at ICU admission during the period from December 2002 through August 2007.
METHODS: Patients in the ICU for more than 48 hours were examined for an ICU-acquired S. aureus infection, defined as development of S. aureus infection more than 48 hours after ICU admission.
RESULTS: S. aureus colonization was present at admission for 1,433 (27.8%) of 5,161 patients (674 [47.0%] with MRSA and 759 [53.0%] with MSSA). An ICU-acquired S. aureus infection developed in 113 (2.19%) patients, of whom 75 (66.4%) had an infection due to MRSA. Risk factors associated with an ICU-acquired S. aureus infection included MRSA colonization at admission (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.70 [95% confidence interval, 3.07-7.21]) and MSSA colonization at admission (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.47 [95% confidence interval, 1.52-4.01]).
CONCLUSION: ICU patients colonized with S. aureus were at greater risk of developing a S. aureus infection in the ICU. Even after adjusting for patient-specific risk factors, MRSA-colonized patients were more likely to develop S. aureus infection, compared with MSSA-colonized or noncolonized patients.



Next Methicillin-resistant CoNS in the community: high homology of SCCmec IVa between S. epidermidis and major clones of MRSA.
J Infect Dis. 2010;202(2):270-81
2010-07-01 159622
Previous Frequent MDR A. baumannii contamination of gloves, gowns, and hands of healthcare workers.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:716-21
2010-06-15 157791
޴ٷΰ ΰ